Utah Dismisses Claims as Time-Barred, Says ‘Time of Exposure is Irrelevant’
November 15, 2012
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
SALT LAKE CITY –– A Utah federal court has dismissed asbestos claims asserted against several defendants, ruling that the case is time-barred since the key inquiry into the applicable limitations period is when the person discovers the cause of his injuries.
In the Oct. 24 ruling, however, the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah found that the limitations period is only applicable to defendants named for the first time in the plaintiff’s first amended complaint.
Plaintiff Aaron Anderson filed the lawsuit, contending that his diagnosis of pleural plaques and asbestosis was caused by occupational asbestos exposure.
A …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach