Ohio Court Declines to Change Wording of Order in Asbestos Insurance Dispute
November 13, 2012
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
CLEVELAND –– An Ohio federal court has denied RPM’s motion to clarify an insurance-related order, finding that the change sought by the plaintiff is not of a clerical nature, but rather would substantially change the original ruling.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio’s Nov. 5 order will allow a 2009 ruling that ordered the plaintiff to reimburse its insurance company more than $200,000 to stand.
The lawsuit arose out of insurance disputes between an asbestos defendant that had undergone a number of restructuring changes and its insurers. Specifically, the plaintiff argued that asbestos claims, arising …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick