Ala. Judge Rejects Navy Plaintiff's Disclaimer, Upholds Federal Officer Removal
October 10, 2011
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
SELMA, Ala. - A federal judge in Alabama has ruled that a formal Naval worker's asbestos-related lawsuit was properly removed under the federal officer removal statute, despite the plaintiffs' effort to disclaim that any of the allegations in his complaint were based on federal law. Kite v. Bill Vann Company Inc., et al., No. 11-0444 (S.D. Ala.).
Judge William H. Steele of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ruled Sept. 29 that CBS Corp.'s removal based on its government contractor defense was adequate in light of plaintiff Cleveland Kite's initial refusal to abandon claims arising from …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach