Defendants File Brief in Component Parts Dispute Pending in High Court
July 12, 2010
DOCUMENTS
- Reply Brief
SAN FRANCISCO -- A defendant involved in a component parts dispute pending in California's highest court has supported its petition for review, contending that the plaintiffs' reliance on a foreseeability argument is misplaced. O'Neil, et al., v. Crane Co., et al., No. S177401 (Calif. Sup. Ct.).
The defendant urges the California Supreme Court to follow the lead of "the majority of courts to address these issues" in the June 29 reply brief.
The underlying petition was filed by defendants who claim that a judgment entered in their favor was wrongfully reversed by the Second District Court of Appeal, who found …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick