Crane Co. Cites Absence of Bankruptcy Claim Forms in Post-Trial Motion
May 21, 2010
DOCUMENTS
- <i>Bell</i> Claim Form Memorandum
- <i>Bell</i> Claim Form Proposed Order
- <i>Bell</i> Post-Trial Motion
- <i>Bell</i> Supplemental Post-Trial Motion
- <i>Nelson</i> Claim Form Memorandum
- <i>Nelson</i> Claim Form Proposed Order
- <i>Nelson</i> Post-Trial Motion
- <i>Nelson</i> Supplemental Post-Trial Motion
PHILADELPHIA -- Crane Co. has filed a post-trial motion in two cases that ended in a combined $18 million verdict on the grounds that the jury was not permitted to view the estimated 25 bankruptcy claims submitted by the plaintiffs prior to the trial, sources told HarrisMartin. Bell, et al. v. Crane Co., et al., November Term, 2008, No. 1975; Nelson, et al. v. Crane Co., et al., December Term, 2008, No. 1335 (Pa. Ct. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Cty.).
Judge Esther R. Sylvester of the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas for Philadelphia County had granted defense requests to have the …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach