Calif. Court Reverses Plaintiff Verdict, Cites Taylor



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


LOS ANGELES -- A California appellate court has reversed a multi-million dollar verdict, ruling that the defendant against which the verdict was entered did not have a duty to warn the plaintiff of hazards associated with products it did not manufacture, supply or distribute. Merrill, et al. v. Leslie Controls Inc., et al., No. B200006 (Calif. Ct. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 3).

In the Nov. 17 opinion, the Second District Court of Appeal said that under Taylor, Leslie Controls could not be held liable because the plaintiffs had not proven that Leslie Controls supplied the asbestos-containing materials contained in its …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape

April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia

MORE DETAILS