Hip & Knee Implant Litigation
With HarrisMartin's Hip & Knee Implant Litigation Report, you will be the first to know about critical developments in these emerging areas of medical device litigation. The report includes coast-to-coast coverage of Zimmer NexGen Knee, Durom Cup Hip, DePuy ASR and Pinnacle Hip, Wright Medical Technology Hip, Smith & Nephew R3 Hip and Journey Knee, Biomet M2a Magnum Hip, Stryker Rejuvenate, ABG II and Trident Hip and Triathlon Knee, and other developing orthopedic device cases. Click Here to Subscribe Now).
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
Issue #90, December 2018
State law failure-to-warn claims based upon a medical device manufacturer’s failure to submit adverse event reports to the FDA are preempted because they seek to enforce the FDCA, which only the federal government may do, the Arizona Supreme Court has ruled.
An Indiana federal judge has awarded Biomet summary judgment in a lawsuit filed by Boeing as assignee of an employee whose M2a Magnum hips failed, ruling that the employee knew of the possible cause of his injuries long before the action was filed, therefore the claims are time-barred.
A lawsuit filed against Biomet in connection with its Magnum M2a hip implant may proceed because there are questions of fact as to whether the claims are timely under Florida law, an Indiana federal judge has ruled.
A lawsuit filed against Biomet in connection with its Magnum hip implant is time-barred under Ohio’s two-year statute of limitations because the plaintiff failed to file suit within the limitations period, an Indiana federal judge has ruled.
An Indiana federal judge has dismissed a Biomet Magnum hip implant case as time-barred, ruling that the plaintiff should have filed suit within Ohio’s two-year statute of limitations for product liability claims.
A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit accusing a medical device maker of conspiring to convince a Missouri man to undergo unnecessary joint preservation surgery in order to generate inflated profits, ruling that the claims were inadequately pled.
A Michigan federal judge has denied Medtronic Inc. summary judgment in a case accusing it of fraudulently misrepresenting the safety of a spinal cord stimulator to a patient with known latex and rubber allergies, finding an issue of fact as to causation.
A Texas federal judge has stayed a case targeting a Smith & Nephew Inc. metal-on-metal hip implant system pending its possible transfer to the BHR hip multidistrict litigation and denied the plaintiff’s motion to remand without prejudice.
Settlement talks have taken place in a Wright Medical Technology Inc. Profemur Hip lawsuit, following a Connecticut federal judge’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claims for design defect, malfunction theory and negligence.
In response to a Utah federal action targeting its hip replacement system, Wright Medical Group Inc. has asserted that the plaintiff’s injuries may have been caused by the acts or omissions of a third person, and that the complaint fails to state a viable claim for relief.