Hip & Knee Implant Litigation
With HarrisMartin's Hip & Knee Implant Litigation Report, you will be the first to know about critical developments in these emerging areas of medical device litigation. The report includes coast-to-coast coverage of Zimmer NexGen Knee, Durom Cup Hip, DePuy ASR and Pinnacle Hip, Wright Medical Technology Hip, Smith & Nephew R3 Hip and Journey Knee, Biomet M2a Magnum Hip, Stryker Rejuvenate, ABG II and Trident Hip and Triathlon Knee, and other developing orthopedic device cases. Click Here to Subscribe Now).
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
An Alabama federal judge has refused to remand an orthopedic nail case to state court, ruling that the amount-in-controversy requirement is most likely met because the plaintiff seeks both compensatory and punitive damages from Stryker Corp.
A Tennessee federal judge has refused to award Stryker Corp. summary judgment in a case involving stabilizer plates, ruling that further discovery is needed to determine whether the manufacturer supplied the devices at issue.
The Ohio federal judge overseeing the DePuy ASR hip MDL docket has dismissed several cases filed by Spanish residents, ruling that the actions should be tried in Spain, where the surgeries and associated medical care took place.
A New York federal judge has refused to remand a Zimmer hip implant case, ruling that the non-diverse distributor defendants were fraudulently joined because plaintiffs’ Ohio Product Liability Act claims against them were implausible.
Issue #95, April 2019
The plaintiffs in five cases pending on the Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II hip MDL docket have asked a Minnesota federal judge to allow case-specific discovery and depositions, explaining that their settlement discussions with Stryker’s counsel have failed.
Smith & Nephew Inc. has asked the judge overseeing the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing docket to enter an order coordinating the MDL with parallel state court litigation, arguing that it will prevent duplication of discovery.
A Florida federal judge has transferred a Stryker hip replacement lawsuit to New Jersey federal court on personal jurisdiction grounds, finding the interests of justice require transfer of the action rather than dismissal.
An Arkansas federal judge has retained jurisdiction over an M2a Magnum hip action, ruling that although the plaintiff’s surgeries took place in a different jurisdiction, Biomet waived venue and therefore it would be inappropriate to _sua sponte_ dismiss or transfer the case.
A New York federal judge has remanded a DePuy hip replacement action to state court, ruling that the non-diverse healthcare defendants were not fraudulently joined because the malpractice claims against them arise from the same occurrence as the product liability claims against the manufacturer defendants.
According to a recent filing by Smith & Nephew Inc., there are 626 active cases pending on the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing multidistrict litigation docket in Maryland federal court.