Hip & Knee Implant Litigation
With HarrisMartin's Hip & Knee Implant Litigation Report, you will be the first to know about critical developments in these emerging areas of medical device litigation. The report includes coast-to-coast coverage of Zimmer NexGen Knee, Durom Cup Hip, DePuy ASR and Pinnacle Hip, Wright Medical Technology Hip, Smith & Nephew R3 Hip and Journey Knee, Biomet M2a Magnum Hip, Stryker Rejuvenate, ABG II and Trident Hip and Triathlon Knee, and other developing orthopedic device cases. Click Here to Subscribe Now).
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
Issue #2, August 2011
Plaintiff and defense counsel will be bound by a protective order approved by the judge overseeing California's coordinated DePuy ASR Hip System cases.
The judge overseeing California's coordinated DePuy ASR Hip System cases has designated San Francisco lawyer Michael Kelly as Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, with authority to coordinate the California plaintiffs' interests with the court.
A Missouri woman has asked the DePuy ASR Hip Implant MDL for leave to amend her complaint to add DePuy International as a defendant, saying she was unaware at the time she filed that the European affiliate manufactured component parts.
A federal judge has ruled in five Alabama cases transferred to the DePuy ASR MDL that remand for lack of diversity is not warranted because Alabama law does not support the claims against in-state sales representatives.
A New Jersey health and benefits fund has filed a lawsuit on behalf of itself and all other parties who paid for members' DePuy Pinnacle hip implants and who now have to cover the cost of further treatment and revision surgeries.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas has issued an updated list of cases coordinated in the DePuy Pinnacle multidistrict litigation, but the court continues to add cases.
A federal magistrate has ruled that a distributor of DePuy's ASR Hip Implant was not fraudulently joined to a lawsuit brought by three Nevada plaintiffs who allegedly suffered injuries as a result of the recalled device.
A federal judge in Maryland who dismissed an earlier version said an amended complaint filed in a hip replacement lawsuit was sufficiently detailed to survive a motion to dismiss.
A North Carolina federal judge has dismissed a hip replacement lawsuit as untimely, ruling that an amended statute of repose did not revive claims that arose when the surgery was performed in 1998.
A federal appeals court has affirmed an order excluding testimony by a metallurgist in a hip replacement case, agreeing with the lower court that the expert's "particle ejection theory" was untested and not subject to peer review.