Hip & Knee Implant Litigation
With HarrisMartin's Hip & Knee Implant Litigation Report, you will be the first to know about critical developments in these emerging areas of medical device litigation. The report includes coast-to-coast coverage of Zimmer NexGen Knee, Durom Cup Hip, DePuy ASR and Pinnacle Hip, Wright Medical Technology Hip, Smith & Nephew R3 Hip and Journey Knee, Biomet M2a Magnum Hip, Stryker Rejuvenate, ABG II and Trident Hip and Triathlon Knee, and other developing orthopedic device cases. Click Here to Subscribe Now).
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
Issue #2, August 2011
A Wisconsin man has filed a lawsuit in federal court against Zimmer Inc., seeking damages for the expected replacement of a Durom Cup hip implant he says is defective.
An Aug. 8 case management order in the coordinated New Jersey DePuy ASR Hip Implant cases includes an indication that early discovery disputes over electronic data and other issues mirror those in the federal MDL.
Plaintiffs' liaison counsel in the coordinated ASR Hip Implant litigation has filed notices alerting the MDL court of counsel's intent to depose representatives of DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and DePuy International Ltd. next month.
DePuy Orthopaedics has asked a federal judge to resolve disagreements that arose in preliminary discovery talks in the ASR Hip Implant Products MDL, including its request for plaintiffs' case-related postings on Facebook.
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has just released an order transferring 28 cases involving Zimmer NexGen knee implant products to a centralized docket in Illinois
Plaintiff and defense counsel will be bound by a protective order approved by the judge overseeing California's coordinated DePuy ASR Hip System cases.
The judge overseeing California's coordinated DePuy ASR Hip System cases has designated San Francisco lawyer Michael Kelly as Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, with authority to coordinate the California plaintiffs' interests with the court.
A Missouri woman has asked the DePuy ASR Hip Implant MDL for leave to amend her complaint to add DePuy International as a defendant, saying she was unaware at the time she filed that the European affiliate manufactured component parts.
A federal judge has ruled in five Alabama cases transferred to the DePuy ASR MDL that remand for lack of diversity is not warranted because Alabama law does not support the claims against in-state sales representatives.
A New Jersey health and benefits fund has filed a lawsuit on behalf of itself and all other parties who paid for members' DePuy Pinnacle hip implants and who now have to cover the cost of further treatment and revision surgeries.