Hip & Knee Implant Litigation
With HarrisMartin's Hip & Knee Implant Litigation Report, you will be the first to know about critical developments in these emerging areas of medical device litigation. The report includes coast-to-coast coverage of Zimmer NexGen Knee, Durom Cup Hip, DePuy ASR and Pinnacle Hip, Wright Medical Technology Hip, Smith & Nephew R3 Hip and Journey Knee, Biomet M2a Magnum Hip, Stryker Rejuvenate, ABG II and Trident Hip and Triathlon Knee, and other developing orthopedic device cases. Click Here to Subscribe Now).
Cyber Monday Promotion Extended through 12/6! Subscribe now at half-price - promotion good on new, annual subscriptions only. Discount already removed from annual subscription rate.
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
Zimmer Inc. has asked the judge overseeing the MDL docket for cases involving its M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis or M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis with Kinectiv Technology and VerSys Femoral Head to allow it to conduct informal interviews with the bellwether plaintiffs’ surgeons.
The judge overseeing the MDL docket for cases involving the Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis or M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis with Kinectiv Technology and VerSys Femoral Head has adopted the parties’ proposed amended schedule, setting Jan. 25, 2021 as the date for the first bellwether trial.
As of Dec. 2, there were 9,903 product liability cases pending on the DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Multidistrict Litigation docket pending in Dallas, according to a recent filing.
A Maryland federal judge has denied Smith & Nephew Inc.’s request to make appealable a ruling that claims relating to the “hybrid” Birmingham Hip Resurfacing-THA and R3-THA hip replacement systems and components are not preempted.
According to a recent court filing by Smith & Nephew Inc., there are 722 total active cases pending on the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing multidistrict litigation docket in Maryland federal court.
A Maryland federal judge has refused to consolidate two Biomet hip cases for trial, explaining that because each plaintiff received a different implant, they do not share overlapping evidence about the devices.
Plaintiffs alleging injuries caused by Stryker’s Tritanium Acetabular Shell hip replacement device have asked the New Jersey Supreme Court to designate the cases as multicounty litigation, arguing that their claims have “common, recurrent issues of law and fact that are associated with a single product.”
Issue #102, November 2019
A New Jersey federal judge has refused to reconsider her dismissal of a Durom Hip Cup action, ruling that the plaintiff’s failure to provide records requested by Zimmer is inexcusable.
A Minnesota federal judge has vacated a magistrate judge’s order imposing discovery sanctions on Boston Scientific Corp. in a qui tam action accusing it of selling defective cardiac defibrillators, ruling that a hearing should be held on the issue.
A Maryland federal judge has refused to consolidate a Biomet M2a Magnum Hip System case with two other pending Biomet hip cases, noting that unlike the other lawsuits, the plaintiff seeks to recover from a device distributor and its president.