Asbestos is the source for more complete asbestos-related litigation news. Summaries of important decisions, verdicts and complaints are at the core of every issue, but this publication isn't simply a review of case law. We identify the critical trends and track important stories as they unfold, bringing you unique insights and valuable information.
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
Jurors have reached a defense verdict in favor of Johnson & Johnson and Imerys Talc America in what is believed to be the first asbestos-containing talcum powder product case to proceed to trial against the defendants, rejecting the plaintiff’s claims that she developed mesothelioma as a result of using Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower.
A Pennsylvania jury has rejected asbestos claims asserted on the behalf of a former HVAC contractor, finding for the five defendants remaining in the case, including Carrier Corp. and Burnham LLC.
A Louisiana federal court has granted an asbestos defendant’s unopposed motion to compel, finding that the discovery sought by the company is relevant and that the defendant has presented evidence to establish that the plaintiffs had failed to timely respond to discovery requests.
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. have moved to dismiss a recently filed asbestos complaint, saying that the lawsuit concerns asbestos and that it is “utterly unclear” from the lawsuit “when, or under what circumstances Plaintiff alleges the J&J defendants were involved in this exposure.”
Jurors are currently deliberating in an asbestos case involving Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower talcum powder products, one day after the parties delivered closing arguments in the trial.
N.Y. Court Orders New Trial On Damages Unless Plaintiff Stipulates to Reduction of $7.7 Million Verdict to $3.47 Million
A New York trial court has ordered that a new trial on damages be held unless asbestos plaintiffs stipulate to the reduction of a $7.7 million asbestos verdict to $3.47 million, holding that the original award deviated from what was reasonable compensation.
A Delaware court has denied Pneumo Abex’s motion for summary judgment in an asbestos case filed by a former automotive mechanic, saying the evidence proffered by the plaintiff created a factual question more appropriately determined at trial.
BorgWarner’s motion for summary judgment in a secondary exposure asbestos case has been granted by a Delaware state court, which concluded that the plaintiff had failed to prove that the decedent was exposed to the defendant’s product.
A Delaware court has awarded summary judgment to Union Carbide in an asbestos case, finding that a reasonable jury could not find, beyond pure speculation, that the defendant was liable for the decedent’s injuries.
A North Carolina federal court has granted a motion to release pathology materials in an asbestos case, finding that the defendant’s actions prior to the fact discovery deadline constituted reasonable diligence.