Talcum Powder Litigation Report
Hot on the heels of separate $72 million and $55 million verdicts entered against Johnson & Johnson defendants, HarrisMartin has launched this Talcum Powder Litigation Report, an online-only resource dedicated solely to news on talc-based powder ovarian cancer claims.
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
Issue #01, April 2016
Missouri Court Allows Plaintiffs Leave to File First Amended Complaint to Add 12 Plaintiffs Over Defense Objections
A Missouri state court has issued an order allowing the current plaintiffs in a multi-plaintiff suit to add additional party plaintiffs bringing allegations that use of talc-based body powder products caused them to develop ovarian cancer.
Johnson & Johnson, Imerys Talc Move for Directed Verdict at Conclusion of Plaintiffs’ Evidence in Talc-Based Powder Trial
Johnson & Johnson and Imerys Talc America Inc. have moved for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence in a talcum powder ovarian cancer trial, according to the court’s online docket.
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., and Imerys Talc America Inc. have filed a notice of appeal to the 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, indicating that they intend to contest a federal court order dismissing without prejudice a talc-based powder suit over their objections.
The eighth day of trial has begun in an action in which a Missouri woman contends that her ovarian cancer was caused by exposure to talc in powder-based personal hygiene products, according to the state court’s online docket.
In a recent complaint, a Washington D.C. resident says her use of Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower has caused her to develop ovarian cancer and that the company ignored various studies evincing the products’ carcinogenic risks.
N.J. Federal Court Allows Parties in Talcum Powder Suit Another Month to Serve Affirmative Expert Reports
A New Jersey federal court overseeing a talc-based powder personal injury suit has amended its pretrial scheduling order, allowing the parties until May 27 to serve any affirmative expert reports.
Jury Selected in Second Missouri Talcum Powder Case; Court Denies Defense Motions for Summary Judgment, to Exclude Experts
The judge overseeing the second talcum powder case to proceed to trial in Missouri has issued orders denying defense motions for summary judgment, to exclude testimony and to transfer venue, according to the court’s online docket.
Plaintiffs have filed 14 new talc-based powder cases in New Jersey in the last three weeks, bringing the total number of cases pending in that state’s coordinated docket to 139, according to a recent published case list.
An October trial setting has been scheduled for the first talc-based powder case to proceed to trial in New Jersey’s coordinated docket, at which time a jury will hear claims from a woman who contends that her use of Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder caused her to develop ovarian cancer at the age of 36.
Parties involved in the second talc-based powder case to proceed to trial in St. Louis have started jury selection, sources with the court confirmed to HarrisMartin Publishing.