Talcum Powder Litigation Report

Hot on the heels of separate $72 million and $55 million verdicts entered against Johnson & Johnson defendants, HarrisMartin has launched this Talcum Powder Litigation Report, an online-only resource dedicated solely to news on talc-based powder ovarian cancer claims.



Issue #03, June 2016

Maryland Plaintiff Voluntarily Dismisses Talc-Based Powder Exposure Claims Without Prejudice

A Maryland federal court has issued a paperless order approving a notice of voluntary dismiss without prejudice filed in a talc-based powder exposure suit filed only months ago.

Parties in Talc-Based Powder Exposure Suit Exchange Briefing on Applicability of Anti-SLAPP Act

The Personal Care Products Council has filed a reply brief backing its motion to dismiss talc-based powder exposure claims under the District of Columbia’s Anti-SLAPP Act, maintaining that its advocacy related to the regulation of talc involves the public’s safety.

Johnson & Johnson Defendants Remove Recently Filed New Mexico Talc-Based Powder Complaint

Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc. have removed a talc-based powder exposure case to a New Mexico federal court, contending that 11 of the plaintiffs are completely diverse from all five named defendants and, further, only four of the plaintiffs are or have been New Mexico residents.

Missouri Judge Moves Talcum Powder Trial up by 2 Weeks by Sua Sponte Order

A Missouri state court judge has moved a talcum powder trial date up by two weeks by a sua sponte order, according to a recent docket entry.

New Talc-Based Powder Exposure Suit Filed in Pennsylvania Federal Court

A talc-based powder exposure suit has been filed in Pennsylvania federal court on behalf of a woman who allegedly developed ovarian cancer as a result of exposure to talc in Baby Powder, resulting in her death at age 58.

Talcum Powder Defendants Say Court Erred When Not Addressing Question of Whether Plaintiffs Were Forum Shopping

The defendants involved in the appeal of an order granting a plaintiff’s motion to dismiss a talc-based powder exposure suit assert that the District Court erred when it did not addressed the question of whether the plaintiffs were engaging in forum shopping.

Talcum Powder Defendants Ask Court to Deny Plaintiff Motion to Stay Proceedings

Defendants that recently removed a multi-plaintiff talcum powder lawsuit to federal court have opposed recent plaintiff efforts to stay the proceedings, arguing that the plaintiffs do not need to conduct jurisdictional discovery since the underlying claims are “wholly detached from Missouri.”

Louisiana Federal Court Grants Plaintiff Motion to Dismiss Talc-Based Powder Exposure Claims

A Louisiana federal court has granted a plaintiff’a motion to dismiss her talc-based powder exposure claims, according to a recent court order.

Johnson & Johnson Defendants Oppose Motion to Remand; Maintain State Court Doesn’t Have Jurisdiction over Majority of Plaintiffs

The Johnson & Johnson defendants named in a multi-plaintiff talcum powder lawsuit have opposed a recent motion to remand, saying that the state court does not have personal jurisdiction over claims of 77 of the 80 named plaintiffs.

Defendants Remove Oklahoma Talc-Based Powder Suit, Cite Diversity of Citizenship

Defendants named in a talc-based powder exposure suit filed in Oklahoma state court have removed the action, saying that complete diversity of citizenship exists between the parties.

Past Issues:


The HarrisMartin VerdicTrack lets you track verdicts by product, state, defendant, or expert.