MDL Mass Tort & Class Action Monitor
Developed to serve primarily as a litigation scouting report for plaintiff and defense counsel, insurers and legal service providers, HarrisMartin’s MDL Mass Tort & Class Action Monitor covers significant new filings and decisions in the JPML, MDL and related mass tort arenas. The quick delivery of breaking news and additional features will keep you within close range of every development occurring in the high-stakes environment of mass torts litigation — where minutes can make a difference. The MDL Mass Tort & Class Action Monitor is an online-only offering that includes frequent email updates and is available at no charge to annual and event sponsors of HarrisMartin’s CLE Conferences.
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
Issue #37, March 2020
According to a recent court filing by Smith & Nephew Inc., there are 744 total active cases pending on the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing multidistrict litigation docket in Maryland federal court.
The plaintiff in a Risperdal gynecomastia case has filed a notice of appeal in Pennsylvania intermediate court after a trial court judge slashed an $8 billion punitive damages verdict to $6.8 million.
The Georgia Supreme court has ruled that a trial court may not exclude an expert witness solely because the witness was identified after the deadline set in a scheduling, discovery, and/or case management order.
Plaintiffs in two Evenflo “Big Kid” car booster car seat actions have asked the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to create a federal docket in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.
Trial has resumed in seven cases pending on the Volkswagen “clean diesel” multidistrict litigation docket following denial of the plaintiffs’ bid to disqualify the California judge from overseeing the proceedings on the basis of bias.
Issue #36, February 2020
The judge overseeing the Zantac (ranitidine) multidistrict litigation docket in Florida federal court has appointed an initial census team to determine the number of filed and unfiled claims under investigation by plaintiffs’ attorneys.
The judge overseeing the federal Taxotere (docetaxel) multidistrict litigation docket has refused to remand a multi-plaintiff action to California state court, ruling that the complaint does not assert a plausible claim against non-diverse defendant McKesson Corp.
A Louisiana federal judge has refused to order a new trial following a defense verdict in the first Taxotere permanent hair loss case to go before a jury, ruling that the court did not erroneously admit certain evidence from Sanofi Aventis’ expert witness.
Based upon a “limited number of cases at present,” the New Jersey Supreme Court has refused to create a consolidated docket for lawsuits targeting Stryker’s Tritanium Acetabular Shell hip replacement device.
Plaintiffs who allege injuries caused by Allergan’s Biocell textured breast implants and expanders have asked the New Jersey Supreme Court to designate a multi-county litigation for centralized management of the actions.