STORY FROM: Asbestos

Md. Court Affirms Holding that John Crane Didn’t Owe Duty in Secondary, Household Exposure Asbestos Suit

ANNAPOLIS, Md. –– A Maryland appellate court has affirmed a holding that John Crane did not owe a duty to warn the wife of a former maintenance worker that handled the company’s asbestos-containing rope product, opining that “it would not have been feasible for [the defendant] to directly warn decedent.”

In the Nov. 2 opinion, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals further held that John Crane had no relationship with the decedent and a duty does not exist solely because John Crane could have warned the decedent’s husband.

The claims were asserted on behalf of Concetta Schatz, who allegedly ...

Associated Documents
Opinion



Registered User Login

Username

Password

True