STORY FROM: Asbestos

Plaintiffs in Asbestos-Containing Talc Case Oppose Efforts to Revisit Jurisdiction

PITTSBURGH –– Plaintiffs in an asbestos-containing talcum powder case have opposed Colgate-Palmolive’s recent efforts to revisit the question of jurisdiction in the case, maintaining that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Daimler decision does not eliminate consent to general personal jurisdiction over a company registered to do business in the state.

In an Aug. 7 opposition brief filed in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas for Allegheny County, the plaintiffs argued that the defendant had failed to raise a substantial question of jurisdiction.

In an amended complaint filed Aug. 4, the plaintiffs stated that Mary Herron frequently used cosmetic talcum products for ...

Associated Documents
Amended Complaint
Opposition Brief

Registered User Login