STORY FROM: Benzene & Emerging Toxic Torts Litigation

Plaintiffs Oppose DuPont’s Post-Trial Briefing in C-8 Case That Ended in $5.6 Million Verdict

CINCINNATI –– Plaintiffs who were awarded $5.6 million at the conclusion of the second bellwether trial to take place in the C-8 personal injury multidistrict litigation docket have opposed DuPont’s post-trial motions, maintaining that the verdict was grounded on “proper legal and factual basis.”

In a Sept. 1 brief filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, the plaintiffs maintained that well-settled law mandates that the court must “do everything possible to harmonize and not disturb the Jury’s verdict.”

“The seven-member jury unanimously determined that DuPont was liable for Mr. Freeman’s damages,” the plaintiffs said. “The ...

Associated Documents
Opposition Brief

Registered User Login



Related Conferences

No conferences scheduled at this time.

Full Archives