Clemco Moves for Judgment on Warnings, Says Plaintiff Didn't Read Them
December 20, 2007
DOCUMENTS
- Motion
ABERDEEN, Miss. - A sandblaster who asserted failure-to-warn allegations against Clemco Industries Corp. in a silica case cannot prove the alleged inadequate warnings were the proximate cause of his injuries when he also testified that he never actually read the warnings, the defendant argues in a motion for summary judgment filed in Mississippi. Riggle v. Pulmosan Safety Equipment Company, et al., No. CV-05-230-PFM (Miss. Cir. Ct., Monroe Cty.).
Clemco Industries Corp. says in its Nov. 14 brief filed in Monroe County Circuit Court that numerous courts - including several in Mississippi - all agree that a product manufacturer cannot be …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo
HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates
May 29, 2024 - Salt Lake City, UT
The Grand America Hotel